Archive for August, 2007

Sword & Buckler: Half Shield

Nick in first ward (like he’s drawing the sword) me in half shield, I’m circling to his right as I advance to try and blind-side him.

Nick in first ward

In this instance he doesn’t react in time so I stab him…Hah.

I stab him!

This time, as I am in 1st ward and enter with a cut to the hand.

A cut to the hand.

i33_004f.jpg

In the following I try the hand cut…

I try the hand cut

as nick prevents this with the bind,

Nick prevents the hand cut with the bind

I (moving back as he moves forward) change at the sword (note the way my buckler is under my sword hand; this should prevent it getting trapped and allow me to grapple should he carry on with the shield knock)…

I charge the sword

i33_008f.jpg

and enter with a counter.

…and enter with a counter.

Edge vs. Flat: The Pedants Revolt

The debate on edge or flat blocking; is it important? (In German swordsmanship.)

One question which remains unresolved, despite regular, sometimes heated debates and re-arisings of its ugly head is ‘what do we block with?’ Is it the flat of the blade, allowing the flexibility of the blade to dissipate the shock of the blow? Or is it the edge, allowing the strength of the blade and the alignment of the hands to absorb the blow?*

I feel personally we may have missed the point!

First, let me explain one principle set forward by S Ringeck. Our first intention when dealing with an opponent is DO NOT BLOCK. As Mr R says, ‘fence strongly, do not wait for what he may use against you’. This could be seen in several ways, we interprate it as:

  1. Fence strongly, try and hit them, you never know it could work. If not it should force
    him to move or at the very least to displace.
  2. Do not seek to follow what he does, the best way I can explain this is if you start to
    strike at his head and he strikes at your lower opening, don’t change direction and try and
    block, press your attack and hit him first.

Now it may seem strange that the first thing I say in relation to blocking is STRIKE, but therein lies the crux of the matter.

WHEN YOU DEFEND, ATTACK!

This means if you can strike him with your defense, do so. If you can’t, again use it to force him to move or displace. Then you can react accordingly.

HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO FLAT OR EDGE BLOCKING?

This intent to strike with all displacements and at all times can effect blocking quite a lot. The importance, as I see it, is not what you use to block, but rather what you use to attack, which is the edge.**

To illustrate my point I would like to use a couple of examples:

  1. Opponent strikes from their right shoulder with an oberhau, you counter with the same technique. Your first intention is to cut him on the head or through the face, in the process however you cover yourself . This should mean that you strike his blade with your true edge, whether it hits his flat or edge in the process depends on the angle of his attack.
  2. Opponent strikes an ober or unterhau from his right, you step off and strike with a krump (true or false edge). If you have the distance (or lack of) then you should first strike at the hands, if you are too far away, then strike the sword. But again STRIKE with your edge, whether or not you hit his flat or edge depends on the angle of his attack.

So what can we surmise from this? If, as above, it is a ‘he attacks/ you counter’ situation there will already be scope for a lot of variation in blade on blade positioning. If we can safely assume you are both moving, that as you try to counter, he will also try to counter that counter and so on. The possible permutations of blade on blade become ludicrous.

I would suggest in closing, that the argument of flat or edge is not a valid one, and that we’d all do better learning to cut with intent.

SO THERE!

*I do understand that this is very much a simplification of the different views expressed by many notables on the subject, but we don’t want to be here all night do we?

**Yes, I realise there is also a point, pommel, and cross guard to attack with.

Theory: Longsword Guards

Here we list our interpretations of Hanko Doebringer’s swordfighting guards. All these guards are described for a right hander on their right. To perform them on the left, reverse the foot position and do them on the left, simple as that. In his fencing text, Sigmund Ringeck says that you shall only fight from four guards as well, however he (and later authors) changes alber and pflug around.

(1) Alber (the Fool):

Stand with your left foot forward, raise the tip of the sword to point at the face or throat of your opponent, the pommel should be above your right knee (not in the centre of your body, this is important). Maintain the threat.*

(2) Pflug (the plough)

Stand with your right foot forward, extend your arms forward and let the point, point towards the ground. Roughly speaking, there should be an almost straight line from your shoulder, down through your arms and sword, to the ground.

This is the only major ward that is performed with the same foot forward as your leading hand(the one closest to the cross guard). The rest will be performed with the left foot forward.

(3) Ochs (the Ox).

Again with your left foot forward, keep the point aimed at the face/throat of your opponent, raise your hands to the right side of your head. Maintain the threat.*

(4) Vom tag (from the roof).

Again with your left foot forward, either hold the sword by your right shoulder with the point toward the ceiling (sky if you are outside, pedant). Or hold the sword above your head, again with the point directed skywards. Maintain the threat.*

*Note maintaining the threat.*

When traveling through the wards, it is important that you should maintain a threat towards your opponent. In between the guards plough and ox this is done with the point, and the point should stay towards the opponent the whole time you are moving from one to the other. In the guard vom tag, the threat is maintained by keeping the true edge toward the opponent. In alber, the threat comes from the false edge.

The minor wards.

Master R also refers to other guards, these are more reactionary positions than those previously mentioned. They are as follows:

(1) The Schrankhut.

This position will tend to come out of a false edge(to the left) krump.It is easiest understood if you picture that you have struck from right to left with a false edge crooked strike, striking over your opponents blade and taking your point almost to the floor, cross your wrists so the left hand is under but higher than the right the right making sure the false edge is under and facing in towards you.

(2) The Nebenhut.

The position is as follows, the right foot should be forward, the blade in its lowest position should be slightly to the left and forward of your left foot, at its highest position in the left plough.

*Note on my definitions*

There is a reason I give this variance in position, and that is nebenhut techniques are performed with a strike from below, to your opponent or his blade, with the false edge traveling from your left to right. If you can perform the techniques as described from said position, they then contain the requisites of nebenhut and are therefore deserving of the name.

(3) The Crown.

We interpret this as being similar to Posta Frontale in Fiore’s style, with the point forward and high and the cross guard arms pointing left and right (as opposed to back and forwards). in order to catch a vertical strike.

Liechtenauer

Johannes Liechtenauer seems to have lived in Germany in the middle and perhaps latter part of the 14thC and wrote down verses in German relating to knightly combat. These verses became the basis for many subsequent German masters of arms in the Liechtenauer lineage, the earliest source we have being that attributed to Hanko Doebringer (c.1389). Later masters in this lineage who we have surviving treatises from include Ringeck, Von Danzig, Kal and Talhoffer. In some of these German sources there are elements which come from a different origin than Liechtenauer’s verses, such as the wrestling of Otto the Jew. At Boar’s Tooth Fight School we study all the Liechtenauer lineage to some degree, but with especial emphasis on the treatise of Sigmund Ringeck.

Longsword1,2,3

I.33 Sword & Buckler

I.33 is dated to c.1280-1320 and is kept at the Royal Armouries, Leeds, UK. It is probably from Southern Germany and is a comprehensive treatise on the use of the sword and buckler (a small fist-held shield) out of armour. It contains pictures and descriptive text.

Sword & Buckler - Half Shield

Half Shield

Sword & Buckler - Hanger

Hanger

Sword & Buckler - Second Ward

Second Ward

Sword & Buckler - End of Point

Sword & Buckler - End of Point

Sword & Buckler - Hitting Nick

Hitting Nick

Class Pett’s Wood

6 September, 2007
7:00 pmto9:30 pm

Class starts promptly at: 7pm

You need: gloves, mask, drill efficient sword and buckler wasters, messer waster, longsword shinai.

Sparring the sword and buckler a fair bit tonight, I’d like to see you concentrate on not rushing your assault, try and find the right time and place for the technique, rather than force it’s placement.

Also, please try to stop fist gripping the sword, it makes the hand unresponsive, try and look at how you hold a dinner knife. keep your grip relaxed and your technique will become more responsive.

See you there, Dave